|
Five Confessions
about Writing in Place
1) Place is not my "subject matter,"
any more than, say, human life (or married love, or grace, or grief)
might be said to be what a poet writes about. Poems play with and
re-present experience, insight, places, of course, but that does not
mean what we write about exists for the pleasures of our writing about
it. Milton did not take up justifying the ways of God
to men as "subject matter." Instead, he waded
fully into the necessary work of imagining God's
epic presence in Creation, into viscerally arguing us through the
tragic consequences of humanity's fall and separation from God. We read
and re-read Milton to experience and re-experience the internal
(infernal) logic of sin and to feel for ourselves the ruptures between
God and humans, between (and within) humans themselves, and between
humans and Creation. Sometimes this experience eludes us. Often it
grips us. Always it is MORE than mere subject matter.
In fact, I think to look at places as
subject matter is to separate them too much from poetry and from
living. Wendell Berry pointedly decries poetry that "degrades the
subject to `subject matter' or raw material, so that the subject exists
for the poem's sake, is subjected to the poem . . .
He [the poet] mines his experience for subject matter."
We exist because particular places
sustain us, and those places go on existing long after we expire. What
I hope for as a writer is to
enter into the life of a place through poetry,
and to invite readers to inhabit the poem as
evidence of the beauty, terror, blessing, and
power of places to shape us and involve us in
their shaping. The poems that matter most to
me (as both writer and reader) seek dialogue with the lives and habits
and histories of a landscape and its inhabitants, for their own sake as
well as for the sake of the poem. I don't want to artistically strip
mine a location for its poetic resources and then move on to the next
likely site. I want to write in such a way that I might live in that
place again, for a long time, and live in the poem with some kind of
continuous music, insight, or longing.
2) A dialogic relationship with
places requires that we change our habits. Instead of moving "through"
the world, we must live "in" the world with a consciousness of how our
living either damages or stewards that place. For a writer, this means
that my language about a place must give evidence of its complexity,
not simplifying or commodifying the landscapes I write. Local color
writers, at their worst, do not allow a place to have both its bold
fall colors AND its gullies full of refuse. The chamber of commerce
cannot permit such complexity.
And writers who are tourists cannot see the
place as it has been and will be for generations hence, but only as a
set of "sights." By not staying put, being "in" a place, writers risk
smoothing a place into nothing more than cement, or poetically
colonizing (or postcarding) it for images.
Instead, I seek to enter into a
dialogue, a conversation with all the levels and layers of a place.
This means that instead of seeking attention, I must pay attention.
3) My life in place has not yet lived
up to my ideals about place. Though I've spent all my life in the
Midwest, I have moved six times in my 11 years of marriage. I have
owned and cared for only one home. I am now teaching at my fifth
college. For all my desire to "have a place / be what that place
requires" (to
steal from William Stafford), I am transient and caught between places.
Perhaps that's one reason I work so hard to poetically inhabit
particular
landscapes:"I want lines to tether us to something
/ after all" and the best I've been able to
do so far is make those lines from language and memory and hope.
4) One of the temptations of place,
for me, is making it a retreat from complexities, making it a panacea
for problems and worries that cannot be solved simply, a kind of
vacation home away from chaos. I sense this temptation on political and
theological levels, as well as poetically.
While I am committed to being
enfolded within particular places and regions, my gaze must always be
as upward and outward as it is downward. Only by understanding one
region's interdependence on and difference from other regions can we
begin to rightly situate ourselves. Perhaps most obviously in a
postmodern world, where places and distance collapse through email and
appear endlessly on television screens, we must be conscious that real
places are not easy or isolated. They exist in fluid ways that require
us to constantly pay attention to how and where we are located.
If we realize the complexity of any
place, we will avoid the risks of being provincial in the most
pejorative sense. We will know when we travel or read about another
country or city that we have just begun to glimpse it.
As poet Carolyn Forche puts it: "A tourist is
someone who takes in the world, or appropriates from the world what he
or she can find useful. But tourists don't really effectively change in
themselves. They go to a place, and they come home. They may have some
experiences to talk about, but they are fundamentally unchanged by
them."
The quality of our engagement with
other provinces will depend in large part of the complexity of our
engagement and dialogue with those places
with which we are most familiar. The poet of
Ecclesiastes asks, "That which is far off, and
exceeding deep, who can find it out?" (Eccl.
7:24). Finding out the wisdom under foot must
begin under foot if we are to see farther and
deeper.
5) Poetry may not be the best way to
literarily engage with place. Fiction, especially longer works, allows
the writer to more extensively wonder and critique the qualities of
places as they accrue around and within characters. Faulkner, Stegner,
Jewett, Haruf, Berry, Russo come to mind as writers who have their
particular places wrapped vividly around their language and characters,
writers whose places seep literally into the plot and become characters
themselves.
Or perhaps creative non-fiction
offers the best possibilities for substantive interaction with places.
Berry's essays, Annie Dillard's natural observations, Kathleen Norris
worrying herself into the Dakotas--these may best offer contemporary
ways to position the self in a community bound by love and care to
specific locations. The honest (even if constructed) ethos of the essay
and meditation speaks to contemporary
readers in ways they can hear. Poetry's utterly
self-conscious language and seeming foreignness frightens the reader.
But if places are to be seen as
complex, then they may require the intricacies of writing and reading
poems. Whatever the case, I
am a poet and must work with music, image, line,
suggestion, and allusion, all ways of inviting
the reader into dialogue rather than asserting
a polemical or narrative necessity. But as a
poet I am in good company. "The mountains rose,
the valleys sank down to the place which thou
didst appoint for them," writes the Psalmist. "Thou didst set a bound
which they should not pass" (Ps. 104). Until I find or am found by a
different voice, imagining (imaging and singing forth) those bounds and
appointed places in poetry will have to do.
|